FirePro W9100
GeForce RTX 2050
FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 2050 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 2050 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 2050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W9100
2014Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2014 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌2566.7% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 51.4 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌27.9% higher power demand at 275W vs 215W.
GeForce RTX 2050
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,850 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2555% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.4 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅FirePro W9100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce RTX 2050 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 215W instead of 275W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W9100 vs GeForce RTX 2050 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W9100
The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.
GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9100 scores 7,748 and the GeForce RTX 2050 reaches 7,714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2050 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (FirePro W9100) vs 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050). Raw compute: 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100) vs 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,748 | 7,714 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 2944+5% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.238 TFLOPS | 10.07 TFLOPS+92% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 176 | 184+5% |
| L1 Cache | 0.69 MB | 2.9 MB+320% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2050 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W9100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2050 carries 4 GB. FirePro W9100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9100 and 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W9100) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9100) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100) vs NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W9100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9100 draws 275W versus the GeForce RTX 2050's 215W — a 24.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9100) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 2050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 215W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 275mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 93 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.2 | 35.9+27% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W9100 came in at $4000, while the GeForce RTX 2050 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2050 was 96.3% cheaper ($3850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (FirePro W9100) vs 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) — the GeForce RTX 2050 offers 2605.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2050 (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $150-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 51.4+2605% |
| Codename | Hawaii | TU104 |
| Release | March 26 2014 | September 20 2018 |
| Ranking | #328 | #94 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W9100 and GeForce RTX 2050
