FirePro W9100 vs Radeon 880M

FirePro W9100

2014Core: 930 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 880M

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

FirePro W9100 vs Radeon 880M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W9100 vs Radeon 880M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W9100

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌1733.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 15W.

Radeon 880M

2024

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024βˆ’2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 275W, a 260W reduction.
  • βœ…More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024βˆ’2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W9100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (7,748 vs 7,729), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 880M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W9100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro W9100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 880M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W9100 vs Radeon 880M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W9100

The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.

AMD

Radeon 880M

The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W9100 scores 7,748 and the Radeon 880M reaches 7,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon 880M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (FirePro W9100) vs 768 (Radeon 880M). Raw compute: 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M).

FeatureFirePro W9100Radeon 880M
G3D Mark Score
7,748
7,729
Architecture
GCN 2.0
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
2816+267%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.238 TFLOPS+18%
4.454 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
176+267%
48
L1 Cache
704 KB+450%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W9100Radeon 880M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W9100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 880M carries 4 GB. FirePro W9100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9100 and System on the Radeon 880M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W9100) vs 2 MB (Radeon 880M) β€” the Radeon 880M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W9100Radeon 880M
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9100) vs 12.2 (Radeon 880M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W9100Radeon 880M
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W9100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M).

FeatureFirePro W9100Radeon 880M
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCN 4.5
Decoder
UVD 4.2
VCN 4.5
Codecs
H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W9100 draws 275W versus the Radeon 880M's 15W β€” a 179.3% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9100) vs 350W (Radeon 880M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 275mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro W9100Radeon 880M
TDP
275W
15W-95%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
275mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
93
β€”
Perf/Watt
28.2
515.3+1727%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 880M (2024 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W9100Radeon 880M
MSRP
$4000
β€”
Codename
Hawaii
Strix Point
Release
March 26 2014
July 15 2024
Ranking
#328
#329

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.