
FirePro W9100 vs GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

FirePro W9100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W9100 is positioned at rank 299 and the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is on rank 9, so the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9100
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W9100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (275mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $200), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 102.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+102.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9100 and GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

FirePro W9100
The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,853 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9100 scores 7,748 and the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design reaches 7,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (FirePro W9100) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,748 | 7,853+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+120% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.238 TFLOPS+38% | 3.789 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 176+120% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+47% | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB. The FirePro W9100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W9100) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9100) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W9100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9100 draws 275W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 109.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9100) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 275mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 80W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 275mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 93 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.2 | 98.2+248% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design costs 50% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.7 (FirePro W9100) vs 78.5 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers 102.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $100-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.7 | 78.5+103% |
| Codename | Hawaii | GP106 |
| Release | March 26 2014 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #328 | #401 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















