GeForce RTX 2050
VS
Quadro P4200 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 2050 vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050

2018Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1710 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P4200 Max-Q

2018Core: 1215 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2050

#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
114%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
113%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
112%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
109%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
108%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
108%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
108%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
107%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
106%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
106%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
105%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
104%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
103%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
102%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
102%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
100%
#48
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $499|Avg: $449
98%
#49
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP: $549|Avg: $540
98%
#50
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
MSRP: $599|Avg: $600
97%
#51
Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $490
96%
#52
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $340
96%
#53
GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP: $599|Avg: $550
95%
#54
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
MSRP: $279|Avg: $380
95%
#55
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
MSRP: $470|Avg: $120
94%
#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
93%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
92%
#58
Arc A380
MSRP: $149|Avg: $119
91%
#59
Radeon RX 9070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
90%
#60
Radeon RX 7900 XT
MSRP: $899|Avg: $630
90%
#61
GeForce RTX 4080
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $800
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4200 Max-Q

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
208%
#12
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2050.

InsightGeForce RTX 2050Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P4200 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 and Quadro P4200 Max-Q

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050

The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

Quadro P4200 Max-Q

The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,800 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 and the Quadro P4200 Max-Q reaches 7,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the Quadro P4200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 6.82 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1480 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Quadro P4200 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
7,714
7,800+1%
Architecture
Turing
Pascal
Process Node
12 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2944+28%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.07 TFLOPS+48%
6.82 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1710 MHz+16%
1480 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
184+28%
144
L1 Cache
2.9 MB+245%
0.84 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2050 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2.0
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Quadro P4200 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.1 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Quadro P4200 Max-Q
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Encoder
NVENC 8.0
NVENC 6.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP11
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the Quadro P4200 Max-Q's 100W — a 73% difference. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 350W (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050Quadro P4200 Max-Q
TDP
215W
100W-53%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
35.9
78.0+117%