GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon 880M

CPU

GPU

GeForce RTX 2050

2018Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1710 MHz

RTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon 880M

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon 880M Performance Spectrum

GeForce RTX 2050

4 GB 215

7,714

0.0%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

GeForce GTX 770

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

GeForce GTX 1660

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Radeon 880M

4 GB 15

7,729

+0.2%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon 880M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon 880M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2050

2018

Why buy it

✅140.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌1333.3% higher power demand at 215W vs 15W.

Radeon 880M

2024

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 215W, a 200W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2050 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 2050 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 140.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 880M instead at 7,729 vs 7,714, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 880M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), a 4nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 2050 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce RTX 2050 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 880M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon 880M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2050

The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon 880M

The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 and the Radeon 880M reaches 7,729 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the Radeon 880M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 768 (Radeon 880M). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12 (Radeon 880M) with 368 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	Radeon 880M
G3D Mark Score	7,714	7,729
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	2944+283%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.07 TFLOPS+126%	4.454 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1710 MHz	2900 MHz+70%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	184+283%	48
L1 Cache	2.9 MB+2131%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46+283%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2050 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 880M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	Radeon 880M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 and System on the Radeon 880M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2 MB (Radeon 880M) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	Radeon 880M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.2 (Radeon 880M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	Radeon 880M
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	Radeon 880M
Encoder	NVENC 8.0	VCN 4.5
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP11	VCN 4.5
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the Radeon 880M's 15W — a 173.9% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 350W (Radeon 880M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	Radeon 880M
TDP	215W	15W-93%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	35.9	515.3+1335%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 880M (2024 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2050	Radeon 880M
MSRP	$150	—
Codename	TU104	Strix Point
Release	September 20 2018	July 15 2024
Ranking	#94	#329

Search GeForce RTX 2050 on Amazon

Search Radeon 880M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.