GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Quadro M5500

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

2021Core: 1185 MHzBoost: 1477 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M5500

2016Core: 1140 MHzBoost: 1165 MHz
Similar parts
···

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Quadro M5500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Quadro M5500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Quadro M5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).

Quadro M5500

2016

Why buy it

  • 27.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M5500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (7,915 vs 7,717), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M5500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M5500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Quadro M5500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M5500

The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile scores 7,717 and the Quadro M5500 reaches 7,915 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Quadro M5500 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5500). Raw compute: 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500). Boost clocks: 1477 MHz vs 1165 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileQuadro M5500
G3D Mark Score
7,717
7,915+3%
Architecture
Ampere
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.05 TFLOPS+27%
4.772 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1477 MHz+27%
1165 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
64
128+100%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB+233%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M5500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileQuadro M5500
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5500 carries 8 GB. Quadro M5500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 256-bit on the Quadro M5500.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileQuadro M5500
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileQuadro M5500
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs NVDEC (Maxwell). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileQuadro M5500
Encoder
NVENC 8.0
NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP11
NVDEC (Maxwell)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile draws 45W versus the Quadro M5500's 150W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 350W (Quadro M5500). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileQuadro M5500
TDP
45W-70%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
171.5+225%
52.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (2021 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2050 MobileQuadro M5500
MSRP
$800
Codename
GA107
GM204
Release
December 17 2021
April 8 2016
Ranking
#349
#321

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.