G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Radeon RX 780 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Radeon RX 780: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 7100

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
60.1% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Radeon RX 780

2024

Why buy it

✅22.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 780 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro WX 7100 instead at 7,701 vs 7,658, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 780 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Pro WX 7100 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 14nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 780 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 cheaper on MSRP at $499 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 59.2% (15.3 vs 9.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Radeon RX 780 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 7100

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 780

The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 7,701 and the Radeon RX 780 reaches 7,658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 2335 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 780
G3D Mark Score	7,701	7,658
Architecture	GCN 4.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2304	3840+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.728 TFLOPS	35.87 TFLOPS+526%
Boost Clock	1243 MHz	2335 MHz+88%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	144	240+67%
L1 Cache	576 KB	768 KB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 780
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 780 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7100 and System on the Radeon RX 780. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 780
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 780
DirectX	12.0	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 780
Encoder	VCE 3.4	RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine
Decoder	UVD 6.3	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 32.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 780
TDP	130W-28%	180W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	112mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	59.2+39%	42.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 7100 came in at $799, while the Radeon RX 780 launched at $499. On MSRP, Radeon RX 780 was 37.5% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 offers 59.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 780 (2024 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	Radeon RX 780
MSRP	$799	$499-38%
Performance per Dollar	9.6	15.3+59%
Codename	Ellesmere	Navi 32
Release	November 10 2016	September 11 2024
Ranking	#331	#131

Search Radeon Pro WX 7100 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 780 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.