Radeon Pro WX 9100
RTX A4000H
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs RTX A4000H Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌119.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,199 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 140W.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅12.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,199 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 112.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 230W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 12,250 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,250+4% | 11,815 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+56% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1560 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+33% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000H gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000H carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 9100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 9100 and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 draws 230W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 140W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.3 | 84.4+58% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 9100 came in at $2199, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. On MSRP, RTX A4000H was 54.5% cheaper ($1199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.6 (Radeon Pro WX 9100) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H offers 110.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4000H (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 9100 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2199 | $1000-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.6 | 11.8+111% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GA104 |
| Release | July 10 2017 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #219 | #226 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 9100 and RTX A4000H
