Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
VS
Radeon Pro WX 9100

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro WX 9100

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1380 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 9100

2017Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

#5
100%
#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
72%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
68%
#16
Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP: $429|Avg: $401
64%
#18
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340
63%
#19
RTX A2000 12GB
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
63%
#20
Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
62%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 9100

#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
155%
#74
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095
136%
#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
127%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
127%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
125%
#78
Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
121%
#79
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
120%
#80
Radeon Pro W6800X
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
115%
#81
Tesla T10
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975
113%
#82
RTX A5000
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800
111%
#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
109%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
108%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
105%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
100%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
98%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
97%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
96%
#90
Quadro P5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
91%
#91
RTX PRO 6000
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
90%
#92
RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
88%
#93
Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
88%
#94
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799
79%
#96
L4
MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800
78%
#97
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500
75%
#98
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000
75%
#99
Tesla M40
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099
73%
#100
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
68%
#101
65%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design.

InsightQuadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro WX 9100
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX 9100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design and Radeon Pro WX 9100

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 9100

The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,250 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design scores 12,173 and the Radeon Pro WX 9100 reaches 12,250 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Raw compute: 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro WX 9100
G3D Mark Score
12,173
12,250
Architecture
Turing
GCN 5.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2560
4096+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.066 TFLOPS
12.29 TFLOPS+74%
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1500 MHz+9%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
256+60%
L1 Cache
2.5 MB+150%
1 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro WX 9100
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 9100 has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 9100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro WX 9100
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro WX 9100
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 9100).

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro WX 9100
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
VCE 4.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro WX 9100's 230W — a 96.8% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 9100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro WX 9100
TDP
80W-65%
230W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
152.2+186%
53.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q DesignRadeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP
$2199
Avg Price (30d)
$550
Codename
TU104
Vega 10
Release
May 27 2019
July 10 2017
Ranking
#220
#219