Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon RX 6850M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon RX 6850M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon RX 6850M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6850M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Radeon RX 6850M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.

Radeon RX 6850M

2022

Why buy it

✅7.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 6850M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (12,274 vs 12,173), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6850M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 12nm and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 6850M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon RX 6850M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.

Radeon RX 6850M

The Radeon RX 6850M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,274 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design scores 12,173 and the Radeon RX 6850M reaches 12,274 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6850M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6850M). Raw compute: 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6850M). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6850M) with 320 Tensor cores.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 6850M
G3D Mark Score	12,173	12,274
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560+43%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.066 TFLOPS	8.659 TFLOPS+23%
Boost Clock	1380 MHz	2416 MHz+75%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160+43%	112
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+400%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	40+43%	28

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6850M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6850M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 6850M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 6850M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6850M) — the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 6850M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6850M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 6850M
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6850M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6850M).

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 6850M
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon RX 6850M's 120W — a 40% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6850M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design	Radeon RX 6850M
TDP	80W-33%	120W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	152.2+49%	102.3