Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Radeon PRO V710
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO V710 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO V710 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO V710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 158W, a 78W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Radeon PRO V710 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅22.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌97.5% higher power demand at 158W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO V710 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design scores 12,173 and the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 12,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710) with 320 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,173+1% | 12,000 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3456+35% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.066 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS+291% |
| Boost Clock | 1380 MHz | 2000 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 216+35% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+233% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 54+35% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO V710 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO V710 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 65.5% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-49% | 158W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 152.2+101% | 75.9 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon PRO V710 (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | October 3 2024 |
| Ranking | #220 | #196 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design and Radeon PRO V710
