Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅11.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design scores 12,173 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,173 | 12,442+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.066 TFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS+9% |
| Boost Clock | 1380 MHz | 1499 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT carries 16 GB. Radeon Pro 5700 XT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5700 XT.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 47.6% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-38% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 152.2+59% | 95.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5700 XT (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #220 | #215 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design and Radeon Pro 5700 XT
