
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon RX 5600 OEM Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon RX 5600 OEM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon RX 5600 OEM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅26.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Radeon RX 5600 OEM is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon RX 5600 OEM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,173 points.

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,333 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design scores 12,173 and the Radeon RX 5600 OEM reaches 12,333 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Raw compute: 7.066 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,173 | 12,333+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.066 TFLOPS+11% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1380 MHz | 1560 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 5600 OEM leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 5600 OEM. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 OEM) — the Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon RX 5600 OEM's 150W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-47% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 152.2+85% | 82.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














