
Radeon R2 vs Quadro FX 5500

Radeon R2
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 5500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R2 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon R2 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 5500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 5500 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R2 | Quadro FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 5500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon R2, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 55.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R2 | Quadro FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R2 and Quadro FX 5500

Radeon R2
The Radeon R2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 254 points.

Quadro FX 5500
The Quadro FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 242 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R2 scores 254 versus the Quadro FX 5500's 242 — the Radeon R2 leads by 5%. The Radeon R2 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Quadro FX 5500 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R2) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5500). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R2) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5500).
| Feature | Radeon R2 | Quadro FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 254+5% | 242 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+60% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS+26% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R2 | Quadro FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R2 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5500 has 1 GB. The Quadro FX 5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R2) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 5500) — the Quadro FX 5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R2 | Quadro FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R2 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 5500's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon R2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R2) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R2 | Quadro FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1+292% | 1.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R2 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Quadro FX 5500 launched at $2999 and now averages $30. The Quadro FX 5500 costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (Radeon R2) vs 8.1 (Quadro FX 5500) — the Quadro FX 5500 offers 55.8% better value. The Radeon R2 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon R2 | Quadro FX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $30-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2 | 8.1+56% |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | GT200B |
| Release | May 13 2019 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #858 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















