
Radeon R3 vs FirePro V3800

Radeon R3
Popular choices:

FirePro V3800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R3 is positioned at rank 438 and the FirePro V3800 is on rank 268, so the FirePro V3800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R3
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V3800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R3 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon R3 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V3800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V3800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R3.
| Insight | Radeon R3 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V3800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $12 versus $50 for the Radeon R3, it costs 76% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 326% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R3 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+326%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($12) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R3 and FirePro V3800

Radeon R3
The Radeon R3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 314 points.

FirePro V3800
The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R3 scores 314 and the FirePro V3800 reaches 321 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R3 is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro V3800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R3) vs 800 (FirePro V3800). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon R3) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V3800).
| Feature | Radeon R3 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 314 | 321+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 800+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS+13% | 1.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R3 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R3 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V3800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V3800 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R3) vs 256 KB (FirePro V3800) — the Radeon R3 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R3 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R3) vs 11.2 (FirePro V3800). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R3 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0)+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R3) vs None (FirePro V3800). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R3) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V3800).
| Feature | Radeon R3 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R3 draws 50W versus the FirePro V3800's 74W — a 38.7% difference. The Radeon R3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R3) vs 350W (FirePro V3800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon R3 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-32% | 74W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.3+47% | 4.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R3 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the FirePro V3800 launched at $129 and now averages $12. The FirePro V3800 costs 76% less ($38 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.3 (Radeon R3) vs 26.8 (FirePro V3800) — the FirePro V3800 offers 325.4% better value. The Radeon R3 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon R3 | FirePro V3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-61% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $12-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 26.8+325% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Juniper |
| Release | May 13 2019 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #757 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













