GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VS
FirePro V3800

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs FirePro V3800

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2610 MHz
VS

FirePro V3800

2010Core: 690 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
111%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
110%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
110%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
110%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
109%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
109%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
107%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
105%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
104%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
104%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
104%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
103%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
102%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
101%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
101%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
100%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
98%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
98%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
96%
#48
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $499|Avg: $449
95%
#49
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP: $549|Avg: $540
94%
#50
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
MSRP: $599|Avg: $600
93%
#51
Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $490
92%
#52
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $340
92%
#53
GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP: $599|Avg: $550
91%
#54
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
MSRP: $279|Avg: $380
91%
#55
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
MSRP: $470|Avg: $120
90%
#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
89%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V3800

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
94%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
94%
#253
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5933%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
100%
#269
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
99%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
99%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
98%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
97%
#274
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
96%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
94%
#277
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
94%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
91%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
89%
#281
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
89%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V3800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9737.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V3800.

InsightGeForce RTX 4070 TiFirePro V3800
Performance
Leading raw performance (+9737.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-9737.4%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (285mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $12), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 100.1% better value per dollar than the FirePro V3800.

InsightGeForce RTX 4070 TiFirePro V3800
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+100.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590)
More affordable ($12)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and FirePro V3800

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

AMD

FirePro V3800

The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the FirePro V3800's 321 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 9737.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the FirePro V3800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 800 (FirePro V3800). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V3800).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiFirePro V3800
G3D Mark Score
31,578+9737%
321
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TeraScale 2
Process Node
4 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
7680+860%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
40.09 TFLOPS+3531%
1.104 TFLOPS
ROPs
80+400%
16
TMUs
240+500%
40
L1 Cache
7.5 MB+9275%
0.08 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB+19100%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro V3800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro V3800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiFirePro V3800
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V3800 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro V3800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiFirePro V3800
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+200%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
48 MB+19100%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 11.2 (FirePro V3800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiFirePro V3800
DirectX
12 Ultimate+7%
11.2
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs None (FirePro V3800). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V3800).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiFirePro V3800
Encoder
NVENC (8th Gen)
None
Decoder
NVDEC (5th Gen)
UVD 2.3
Codecs
AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the FirePro V3800's 74W — a 117.5% difference. The FirePro V3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (FirePro V3800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiFirePro V3800
TDP
285W
74W-74%
Recommended PSU
700W
350W-50%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
285mm
168mm
Height
112mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80
Perf/Watt
110.8+2477%
4.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the FirePro V3800 launched at $129 and now averages $12. The FirePro V3800 costs 98% less ($578 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 26.8 (FirePro V3800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 99.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiFirePro V3800
MSRP
$799
$129-84%
Avg Price (30d)
$590
$12-98%
Performance per Dollar
53.5+100%
26.8
Codename
AD104
Juniper
Release
January 3 2023
April 26 2010
Ranking
#11
#780