Radeon R4 vs FirePro RG220
Radeon R4
Popular choices:
FirePro RG220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R4 is positioned at rank #279 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R4
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R4 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro RG220.
| Insight | Radeon R4 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R4 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R4 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 3.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R4 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R4 and FirePro RG220
Radeon R4
The Radeon R4 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 346 points. Launch price was $79.
FirePro RG220
The FirePro RG220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R4 scores 346 and the FirePro RG220 reaches 335 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R4 is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro RG220 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R4) vs 768 (FirePro RG220). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R4) vs 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro RG220).
| Feature | Radeon R4 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 346+3% | 335 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS | 1.267 TFLOPS+39% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 192 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R4 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R4 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R4 draws 50W versus the FirePro RG220's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R4) vs 350W (FirePro RG220). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R4 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | Unknown |
| Perf/Watt | 6.9+214% | 2.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R4 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro RG220 launched at $0 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.3 (Radeon R4) vs 16.8 (FirePro RG220) — the Radeon R4 offers 3% better value. The Radeon R4 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R4 | FirePro RG220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.3+3% | 16.8 |
| Codename | Lexa | Pitcairn |
| Release | April 20 2017 | February 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #773 | #619 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R4 and FirePro RG220
