Radeon R4 vs GeForce 9800M GTS
Radeon R4
Popular choices:
GeForce 9800M GTS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R4 is positioned at rank 279 and the GeForce 9800M GTS is on rank 658, so the Radeon R4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R4
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GTS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R4 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The Radeon R4 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800M GTS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9800M GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R4.
| Insight | Radeon R4 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9800M GTS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9800M GTS holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 37.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R4 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+37.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R4 and GeForce 9800M GTS
Radeon R4
The Radeon R4 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 346 points. Launch price was $79.
GeForce 9800M GTS
The GeForce 9800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 357 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R4 scores 346 and the GeForce 9800M GTS reaches 357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R4 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce 9800M GTS uses G9x, both on 14 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R4) vs 224 (GeForce 9800M GTS).
| Feature | Radeon R4 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 346 | 357+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+71% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R4 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R4 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R4 draws 50W versus the GeForce 9800M GTS's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R4) vs 350W (GeForce 9800M GTS). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon R4 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.9+188% | 2.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R4 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 9800M GTS launched at $200 and now averages $15. The GeForce 9800M GTS costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.3 (Radeon R4) vs 23.8 (GeForce 9800M GTS) — the GeForce 9800M GTS offers 37.6% better value. The Radeon R4 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon R4 | GeForce 9800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-50% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.3 | 23.8+38% |
| Codename | Lexa | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | April 20 2017 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #773 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R4 and GeForce 9800M GTS
