
Radeon R4 vs Intel UHD Graphics 605

Radeon R4
Popular choices:

Intel UHD Graphics 605
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R4 is positioned at rank #279 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R4
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R4 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R4 | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 605 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R4 and Intel UHD Graphics 605

Radeon R4
The Radeon R4 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 346 points. Launch price was $79.

Intel UHD Graphics 605
The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 364 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R4 scores 346 versus the Intel UHD Graphics 605's 364 — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 leads by 5.2%. The Radeon R4 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 605 uses Generation 9.5, both on 14 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R4) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R4) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R4 | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 346 | 364+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 384+109% | 184 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS+115% | 0.4232 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1150 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 24+4% | 23 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R4 | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R4 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 605 has 0 MB. The Radeon R4 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R4 | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R4 draws 50W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 605's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R4) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 605). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon R4 | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 15W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.9 | 24.3+252% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R4 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Intel UHD Graphics 605 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 605 costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.3 (Radeon R4) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 605) — the Intel UHD Graphics 605 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R4 | Intel UHD Graphics 605 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | Lexa | Comet Lake GT2 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | October 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #773 | #824 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















