
Radeon R4E vs GeForce GT 240

Radeon R4E
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R4E is positioned at rank 235 and the GeForce GT 240 is on rank 197, so the GeForce GT 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R4E
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 240
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R4E.
| Insight | Radeon R4E | GeForce GT 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R4E offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R4E holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $80), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 293.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R4E | GeForce GT 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+293.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R4E and GeForce GT 240

Radeon R4E
The Radeon R4E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 487 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce GT 240
The GeForce GT 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R4E scores 487 and the GeForce GT 240 reaches 495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R4E is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GT 240 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R4E) vs 384 (GeForce GT 240). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R4E) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240).
| Feature | Radeon R4E | GeForce GT 240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 487 | 495+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS+19% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+200% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R4E | GeForce GT 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R4E comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 240 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 240 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R4E) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 240) — the Radeon R4E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R4E | GeForce GT 240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R4E draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 240's 64W — a 24.6% difference. The Radeon R4E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R4E) vs 300W (GeForce GT 240). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R4E | GeForce GT 240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-22% | 64W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.7+26% | 7.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R4E launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GT 240 launched at $80 and now averages $80. The Radeon R4E costs 75% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.4 (Radeon R4E) vs 6.2 (GeForce GT 240) — the Radeon R4E offers 293.5% better value. The Radeon R4E is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R4E | GeForce GT 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $80-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-75% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4+294% | 6.2 |
| Codename | Lexa | GK107 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #773 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











