Radeon R4E vs Radeon R5 M315

AMD

Radeon R4E

2017Core: 1183 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M315

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R4E vs Radeon R5 M315 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R4E vs Radeon R5 M315 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R4E vs Radeon R5 M315: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R4E

2017

Why buy it

  • 35.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 49.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 M315

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R4E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R4E is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 35.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 M315 instead at 489 vs 487, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R4E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R4E makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 49.4% (4.9 vs 3.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R4E vs Radeon R5 M315 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R4E

The Radeon R4E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 487 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon R5 M315

The Radeon R5 M315 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 489 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R4E scores 487 and the Radeon R5 M315 reaches 489 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R4E is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R5 M315 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R4E) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M315). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R4E) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M315). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R4ERadeon R5 M315
G3D Mark Score
487
489
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+20%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9085 TFLOPS+38%
0.6592 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1124 MHz+9%
1030 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
24+20%
20
L1 Cache
96 KB+20%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R4ERadeon R5 M315
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon R4E and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M315. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R4E) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M315) — the Radeon R4E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R4ERadeon R5 M315
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R4E draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 M315's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R4E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R4E) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M315). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R4ERadeon R5 M315
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Perf/Watt
9.7+49%
6.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R4E came in at $100, while the Radeon R5 M315 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon R4E was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (Radeon R4E) vs 3.3 (Radeon R5 M315) — the Radeon R4E offers 48.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R4E (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon R4ERadeon R5 M315
MSRP
$100-33%
$150
Performance per Dollar
4.9+48%
3.3
Codename
Lexa
Jet
Release
April 20 2017
May 15 2016
Ranking
#773
#922

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.