Radeon R5 220
VS
Quadro FX 380 LP

Radeon R5 220 vs Quadro FX 380 LP

AMD

Radeon R5 220

2013Core: 947 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380 LP

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 220 is positioned at rank 252 and the Quadro FX 380 LP is on rank 362, so the Radeon R5 220 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 220

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1727%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1659%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1640%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1637%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1634%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1625%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1604%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1598%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1583%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1579%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1560%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1557%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1529%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1528%
#236
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1905%
#252
Radeon R5 220
MSRP: $35|Avg: $15
100%
#253
Radeon HD 7350
MSRP: $40|Avg: $10
98%
#254
GeForce GTX 285
MSRP: $359|Avg: $30
98%
#255
Radeon HD 7570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#256
Radeon HD 6380G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#257
Radeon HD 4550
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
95%
#258
RADEON HD7450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
95%
#259
GeForce GT 330
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
95%
#261
Radeon HD 7340G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
93%
#262
Radeon HD 8210E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#263
Radeon 535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
92%
#265
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
MSRP: $85|Avg: $15
91%
#266
GeForce GT 130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380 LP

#347
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
17178%
#362
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
100%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
94%
#365
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
93%
#366
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
93%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
92%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
91%
#369
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
91%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
83%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
79%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
77%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
76%
#374
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
71%
#375
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
71%
#376
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
71%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R5 220 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 380 LP.

InsightRadeon R5 220Quadro FX 380 LP
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R5 220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R5 220Quadro FX 380 LP
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 220 and Quadro FX 380 LP

AMD

Radeon R5 220

The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380 LP

The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 220 scores 147 and the Quadro FX 380 LP reaches 145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 220 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro FX 380 LP uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R5 220) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP). Raw compute: 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP).

FeatureRadeon R5 220Quadro FX 380 LP
G3D Mark Score
147+1%
145
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
2560+967%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.849 TFLOPS+679%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+100%
80
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 220Quadro FX 380 LP
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 220 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 380 LP has 512 MB. The Radeon R5 220 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R5 220) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 380 LP) — the Radeon R5 220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 220Quadro FX 380 LP
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 220 draws 275W versus the Quadro FX 380 LP's 189W — a 37.1% difference. The Quadro FX 380 LP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 220) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R5 220Quadro FX 380 LP
TDP
275W
189W-31%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
0.5
0.8+60%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 220 launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro FX 380 LP launched at $169 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.8 (Radeon R5 220) vs 9.7 (Quadro FX 380 LP) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 1% better value. The Radeon R5 220 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon R5 220Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP
$35-79%
$169
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$15
Performance per Dollar
9.8+1%
9.7
Codename
Hawaii
GT200B
Release
November 5 2013
November 11 2008
Ranking
#316
#815