Radeon R5 220 vs Quadro 400
Radeon R5 220
Popular choices:
Quadro 400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 220 is positioned at rank 252 and the Quadro 400 is on rank 360, so the Radeon R5 220 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 220
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 220 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R5 220 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $500), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3210.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 220 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3210.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 220 and Quadro 400
Radeon R5 220
The Radeon R5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $399.
Quadro 400
The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 220 scores 147 and the Quadro 400 reaches 148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 220 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro 400 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R5 220) vs 256 (Quadro 400). Raw compute: 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 220) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400).
| Feature | Radeon R5 220 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 147 | 148 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+900% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.849 TFLOPS+656% | 0.641 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 160+900% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+567% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 220 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 220 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 400 has 512 MB. The Radeon R5 220 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R5 220) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 400) — the Radeon R5 220 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 220 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon R5 220) vs 10_1 (Quadro 400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R5 220 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+12% | 10_1 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 220 draws 275W versus the Quadro 400's 30W — a 160.7% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 220) vs 350W (Quadro 400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R5 220 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 30W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 4.9+880% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 220 launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro 400 launched at $169 and now averages $500. The Radeon R5 220 costs 97% less ($485 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.8 (Radeon R5 220) vs 0.3 (Quadro 400) — the Radeon R5 220 offers 3166.7% better value. The Quadro 400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R5 220 | Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-79% | $169 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-97% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.8+3167% | 0.3 |
| Codename | Hawaii | GP107 |
| Release | November 5 2013 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #316 | #741 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 220 and Quadro 400
