Radeon R5 310 vs FirePro 3D V3750

Radeon R5 310

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz

FirePro 3D V3750

2014Core: 850 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon R5 310

332

0.0%

Mobility Radeon HD 5430

341

+2.7%

Mobility Radeon HD 540v

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 310 is positioned at rank 424 and the FirePro 3D V3750 is on rank 307, so the FirePro 3D V3750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 310

#414

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1601%

#416

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1452%

#417

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1448%

#421

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1317%

#422

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1308%

#424

Radeon R5 310

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#425

Radeon HD 7690M XT

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

99%

#426

Radeon HD 7600G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

99%

#427

Radeon R7 A265

MSRP: $149|Avg: $149

98%

#428

Radeon R9 M470

MSRP: $350|Avg: $80

98%

#429

Radeon R9 M385X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

98%

#431

Mobility Radeon HD 5570

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

97%

#432

Radeon R5 M430

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

97%

#433

GeForce 810A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

97%

#434

GeForce GT 520MX

MSRP: $45|Avg: $10

95%

#435

Radeon R5 330

MSRP: $81|Avg: $45

95%

#437

Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

94%

#438

Radeon R3

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

93%

#439

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3750

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

92%

#292

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8639%

#307

FirePro 3D V3750

MSRP: $199|Avg: $25

100%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

99%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

98%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

96%

#312

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

95%

#313

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

94%

#314

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

92%

#315

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

92%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

90%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

89%

#319

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

89%

#320

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

89%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

88%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro 3D V3750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 310 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon R5 310	FirePro 3D V3750
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R5 310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 310 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 62.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R5 310	FirePro 3D V3750
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+62.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($15)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R5 310 Benchmark Check

FirePro 3D V3750 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 310 and FirePro 3D V3750

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

FirePro 3D V3750

The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 310 scores 332 and the FirePro 3D V3750 reaches 341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 310 is built on GCN 3.0 while the FirePro 3D V3750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 310) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3750).

Feature	Radeon R5 310	FirePro 3D V3750
G3D Mark Score	332	341+3%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	3.482 TFLOPS+343%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	128+433%
L1 Cache	96 KB	512 KB+433%
L2 Cache	128 KB	768 KB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R5 310	FirePro 3D V3750
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 310 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V3750 has 256 MB. The Radeon R5 310 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 310) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3750) — the FirePro 3D V3750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R5 310	FirePro 3D V3750
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	768 KB+500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 310 draws 50W versus the FirePro 3D V3750's 274W — a 138.3% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 310) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V3750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R5 310	FirePro 3D V3750
TDP	50W-82%	274W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	6.6+450%	1.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 310 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the FirePro 3D V3750 launched at $199 and now averages $25. The Radeon R5 310 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.1 (Radeon R5 310) vs 13.6 (FirePro 3D V3750) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 62.5% better value. The Radeon R5 310 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).