Radeon R5 310 vs GeForce 8800 GS
Radeon R5 310
Popular choices:
GeForce 8800 GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 310 is positioned at rank 424 and the GeForce 8800 GS is on rank 629, so the Radeon R5 310 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 310
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800 GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R5 310 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The Radeon R5 310 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8800 GS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 8800 GS offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 310 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $40), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 168.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+168.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 310 and GeForce 8800 GS
Radeon R5 310
The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.
GeForce 8800 GS
The GeForce 8800 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 310 scores 332 and the GeForce 8800 GS reaches 330 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 310 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce 8800 GS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 310) vs 224 (GeForce 8800 GS).
| Feature | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 332 | 330 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+71% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 310 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8800 GS has 768 MB. The GeForce 8800 GS offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.75 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 310 draws 50W versus the GeForce 8800 GS's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 310) vs 350W (GeForce 8800 GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.6+200% | 2.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 310 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 8800 GS launched at $150 and now averages $40. The Radeon R5 310 costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.1 (Radeon R5 310) vs 8.3 (GeForce 8800 GS) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 166.3% better value. The Radeon R5 310 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce 8800 GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-67% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-63% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.1+166% | 8.3 |
| Codename | Weston | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | April 18 2017 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #873 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 310 and GeForce 8800 GS
