CPU
GPU
Radeon R5 310
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 310 is positioned at rank 424 and the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is on rank 266, so the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 310
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT.
| Insight | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 310 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 310 and GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
Radeon R5 310
The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 325 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 310 scores 332 and the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT reaches 325 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 310 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 310) vs 1,280 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310) vs 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1709 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 332+2% | 325 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 4.375 TFLOPS+456% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 1709 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 8 | 40+400% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 480 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1.25 MB+862% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 310) vs 1.25 MB (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) — the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1.25 MB+862% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 310 draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT's 120W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 310) vs 350W (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-58% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.6+144% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 310 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT launched at $85 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.1 (Radeon R5 310) vs 21.7 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 1.8% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R5 310 | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-42% | $85 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.1+2% | 21.7 |
| Codename | Weston | GP106 |
| Release | April 18 2017 | December 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #873 | #289 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 310 and GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
