Radeon R5 310
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Radeon R5 310 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

Radeon R5 310

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R5 310 is positioned at rank #424 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 310

#414
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1601%
#416
1452%
#417
1448%
#421
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1317%
#422
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1308%
#424
Radeon R5 310
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#425
Radeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
99%
#426
Radeon HD 7600G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#427
Radeon R7 A265
MSRP: $149|Avg: $149
98%
#428
Radeon R9 M470
MSRP: $350|Avg: $80
98%
#429
Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#431
Mobility Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
97%
#432
Radeon R5 M430
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
97%
#433
GeForce 810A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#434
GeForce GT 520MX
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
95%
#435
Radeon R5 330
MSRP: $81|Avg: $45
95%
#437
Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#438
Radeon R3
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
93%
#439
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 310 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6018.1% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 310.

InsightRadeon R5 310GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-6018.1%)
Leading raw performance (+6018.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 227.8% better value per dollar than the Radeon R5 310.

InsightRadeon R5 310GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+227.8%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 310 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R5 310 scores 332 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 6018.1%. The Radeon R5 310 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 310) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R5 310GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
332
20,312+6018%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
384
4864+1167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7864 TFLOPS
16.2 TFLOPS+1960%
Boost Clock
1024 MHz
1665 MHz+63%
ROPs
8
80+900%
TMUs
24
152+533%
L1 Cache
0.09 MB
4.8 MB+5233%
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
4 MB+2977%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 310GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 310 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 310) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 310GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
8 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
448 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
4 MB+2977%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 310 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 120% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 310) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.

FeatureRadeon R5 310GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
50W-75%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
6.6
101.6+1439%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 310 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The Radeon R5 310 costs 94.6% less ($265 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.1 (Radeon R5 310) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 228.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon R5 310GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$49-88%
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$15-95%
$280
Performance per Dollar
22.1
72.5+228%
Codename
Weston
GA104
Release
April 18 2017
December 1 2020
Ranking
#873
#73