Radeon R5 420 vs Radeon R5 A240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 420 vs Radeon R5 A240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 420 vs Radeon R5 A240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 420

2017

Why buy it

✅38.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 A240

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 420 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
25% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 420 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 38.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 A240 instead at 576 vs 575, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R5 420 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 420 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 24.8% (7.2 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R5 420 vs Radeon R5 A240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 420

The Radeon R5 420 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon R5 A240

The Radeon R5 A240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 576 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 420 scores 575 and the Radeon R5 A240 reaches 576 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 420 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R5 A240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 420) vs 320 (Radeon R5 A240). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 420) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A240). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 780 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R5 420	Radeon R5 A240
G3D Mark Score	575	576
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384+20%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9085 TFLOPS+103%	0.448 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1124 MHz+44%	780 MHz
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	24+20%	20
L1 Cache	96 KB+20%	80 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R5 420	Radeon R5 A240
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 420 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A240. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R5 420) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 A240) — the Radeon R5 420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R5 420	Radeon R5 A240
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 420 draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 A240's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R5 A240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 420) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A240). Power connectors: None vs None.

Feature	Radeon R5 420	Radeon R5 A240
TDP	50W	30W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Perf/Watt	11.5	19.2+67%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 420 came in at $80, while the Radeon R5 A240 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon R5 420 was 20% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon R5 420) vs 5.8 (Radeon R5 A240) — the Radeon R5 420 offers 24.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 420 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R5 420	Radeon R5 A240
MSRP	$80-20%	$100
Performance per Dollar	7.2+24%	5.8
Codename	Lexa	Oland
Release	April 20 2017	October 8 2013
Ranking	#773	#911

Search Radeon R5 420 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 A240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.