CPU
GPU
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 430 OEM is positioned at rank 1 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is on rank 336, so the Radeon R5 430 OEM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 430 OEM
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 430 OEM.
| Insight | Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $13), it costs 23% less, resulting in a 32.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($13) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Radeon R5 430 OEM
The Radeon R5 430 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 30 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 780 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,222 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 430 OEM scores 1,200 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual reaches 1,222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 430 OEM) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual).
| Feature | Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,200 | 1,222+2% |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 430 OEM draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon R5 430 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 24.0 | 24.4+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual costs 23.1% less ($3 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 92.3 (Radeon R5 430 OEM) vs 122.2 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) — the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual offers 32.4% better value. The Radeon R5 430 OEM is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $13 | $10-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 92.3 | 122.2+32% |
| Codename | Oland | — |
| Release | June 30 2016 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #874 | #881 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
