Radeon R5 430 OEM
VS
NVS 810

Radeon R5 430 OEM vs NVS 810

AMD

Radeon R5 430 OEM

2016Core: 730 MHzBoost: 780 MHz
VS

NVS 810

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 430 OEM is positioned at rank 1 and the NVS 810 is on rank 309, so the Radeon R5 430 OEM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 430 OEM

#1
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
100%
#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
91%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
87%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
86%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
86%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
86%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
85%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
84%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
84%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
83%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
83%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
82%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
82%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
80%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
80%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 810

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
92%
#294
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
8690%
#309
NVS 810
MSRP: $700|Avg: $80
100%
#310
GRID P40-2Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340
99%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
96%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
96%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
94%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
93%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
92%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
91%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
90%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
89%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
89%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
89%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
87%
#323
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
84%
#324
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R5 430 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the NVS 810 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R5 430 OEMNVS 810
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R5 430 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 430 OEM holds the technical lead. Priced at $13 (vs $80), it costs 84% less, resulting in a 519.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R5 430 OEMNVS 810
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+519.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($13)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 430 OEM and NVS 810

AMD

Radeon R5 430 OEM

The Radeon R5 430 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 30 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 780 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

NVIDIA

NVS 810

The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 430 OEM scores 1,200 and the NVS 810 reaches 1,192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 430 OEM is built on GCN 1.0 while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 430 OEM) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 0.599 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430 OEM) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810). Boost clocks: 780 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R5 430 OEMNVS 810
G3D Mark Score
1,200
1,192
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
512 ×2+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.599 TFLOPS
1.058 TFLOPS ×2+77%
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1033 MHz+32%
ROPs
8
16 ×2+100%
TMUs
24
32 ×2+33%
L1 Cache
96 KB
256 KB+167%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 430 OEMNVS 810
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 430 OEM comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 has 4 GB. The NVS 810 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 430 OEM) vs 1 MB (NVS 810) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 430 OEMNVS 810
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 430 OEM draws 50W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon R5 430 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon R5 430 OEM) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R5 430 OEMNVS 810
TDP
50W-26%
68W
Recommended PSU
250W-29%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
198mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
24.0+37%
17.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 430 OEM costs 83.8% less ($67 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 92.3 (Radeon R5 430 OEM) vs 14.9 (NVS 810) — the Radeon R5 430 OEM offers 519.5% better value. The Radeon R5 430 OEM is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R5 430 OEMNVS 810
MSRP
$700
Avg Price (30d)
$13-84%
$80
Performance per Dollar
92.3+519%
14.9
Codename
Oland
GM107
Release
June 30 2016
November 4 2015
Ranking
#874
#826