Radeon R5 430
VS
GRID P40-6Q

Radeon R5 430 vs GRID P40-6Q

AMD

Radeon R5 430

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
VS

GRID P40-6Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 430 is positioned at rank 303 and the GRID P40-6Q is on rank 396, so the Radeon R5 430 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 430

#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
100%
#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
93%
#293
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
723%
#295
655%
#296
654%
#300
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
594%
#301
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
590%
#303
Radeon R5 430
MSRP: $59|Avg: $50
100%
#305
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
100%
#307
GeForce MX450
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
99%
#308
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
98%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
98%
#312
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
95%
#314
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
94%
#315
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-6Q

#381
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
49243%
#396
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
100%
#397
Quadro FX 540
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
90%
#398
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
80%
#399
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
80%
#400
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
80%
#401
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
77%
#402
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
77%
#403
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
73%
#405
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
67%
#406
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
67%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
60%
#409
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
57%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
53%
#411
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
53%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID P40-6Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 430.

InsightRadeon R5 430GRID P40-6Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R5 430 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 430 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 193.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R5 430GRID P40-6Q
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+193.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 430 and GRID P40-6Q

AMD

Radeon R5 430

The Radeon R5 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 886 points.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-6Q

The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 430 scores 886 and the GRID P40-6Q reaches 905 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 430 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P40-6Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 430) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-6Q).

FeatureRadeon R5 430GRID P40-6Q
G3D Mark Score
886
905+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
1536+380%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6592 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS+247%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
20
128+540%
L1 Cache
80 KB
128 KB+60%
L2 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 430GRID P40-6Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 430) vs 512 KB (GRID P40-6Q) — the GRID P40-6Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 430GRID P40-6Q
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R5 430) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-6Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon R5 430GRID P40-6Q
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12_1
Max Displays
2
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 430 draws 30W versus the GRID P40-6Q's 225W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon R5 430 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 430) vs 350W (GRID P40-6Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon R5 430GRID P40-6Q
TDP
30W-87%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
1mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
29.5+638%
4.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 430 launched at $59 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID P40-6Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The Radeon R5 430 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.7 (Radeon R5 430) vs 6.0 (GRID P40-6Q) — the Radeon R5 430 offers 195% better value. The Radeon R5 430 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R5 430GRID P40-6Q
MSRP
$59-98%
$3000
Avg Price (30d)
$50-67%
$150
Performance per Dollar
17.7+195%
6.0
Codename
Jet
GK104
Release
May 15 2016
June 28 2013
Ranking
#922
#628