Radeon R5 430 vs Radeon R7 240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 430 vs Radeon R7 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 430 vs Radeon R7 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 430

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 13.1 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 240 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 240

2013

Why buy it

✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
16.9% HIGHER MSRP
$69 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 240 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (902 vs 886), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R5 430 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 430 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $69, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 14.9% (15.0 vs 13.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 240 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R5 430 vs Radeon R7 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 430

The Radeon R5 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 886 points.

Radeon R7 240

The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 430 scores 886 and the Radeon R7 240 reaches 902 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 430 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 430) vs 320 (Radeon R7 240). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 780 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R5 430	Radeon R7 240
G3D Mark Score	886	902+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6592 TFLOPS+47%	0.448 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1030 MHz+32%	780 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	20	20
L1 Cache	80 KB	80 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R5 430	Radeon R7 240
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 430 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 240 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 240 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 430 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 240. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 430) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 240) — the Radeon R7 240 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R5 430	Radeon R7 240
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 430 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 240's 30W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 430) vs 300W (Radeon R7 240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Radeon R5 430	Radeon R7 240
TDP	30W	30W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	29.5	30.1+2%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 430 came in at $59, while the Radeon R7 240 launched at $69. On MSRP, Radeon R5 430 was 14.5% cheaper ($10 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (Radeon R5 430) vs 13.1 (Radeon R7 240) — the Radeon R5 430 offers 14.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 430 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R5 430	Radeon R7 240
MSRP	$59-14%	$69
Performance per Dollar	15.0+15%	13.1
Codename	Jet	Oland
Release	May 15 2016	October 8 2013
Ranking	#922	#911

Search Radeon R5 430 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.