Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R5 430

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 430

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

100%

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

93%

#293

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

723%

#295

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

655%

#296

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

654%

#300

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

594%

#301

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

590%

#303

Radeon R5 430

MSRP: $59|Avg: $50

100%

#304

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

100%

#307

GeForce MX450

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

99%

#308

Arc Graphics 140V

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

98%

#309

Radeon R7 A8-8650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

98%

#312

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

95%

#314

GeForce GT 720A

MSRP: $40|Avg: $40

94%

#315

GeForce MX110

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Graphics 6100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 430 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon R5 430
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Graphics 6100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Graphics 6100 Benchmark Check

Radeon R5 430 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon R5 430

Iris Graphics 6100

The Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 899 points.

Radeon R5 430

The Radeon R5 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 886 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Graphics 6100 scores 899 and the Radeon R5 430 reaches 886 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 6100 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon R5 430 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 320 (Radeon R5 430). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon R5 430
G3D Mark Score	899+1%	886
Architecture	Generation 8.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384+20%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS+17%	0.6592 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	1030 MHz+3%
ROPs	6	8+33%
TMUs	48+140%	20

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon R5 430
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Graphics 6100 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 430 has 512 MB. The Radeon R5 430 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon R5 430
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R5 430). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon R5 430
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Graphics 6100) vs None (Radeon R5 430). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,VC-1 (Iris Graphics 6100) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 430).

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon R5 430
Encoder	QuickSync	None
Decoder	QuickSync	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Graphics 6100 draws 15W versus the Radeon R5 430's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Graphics 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 350W (Radeon R5 430). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon R5 430
TDP	15W-50%	30W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	168mm
Height	0mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85	75-12%
Perf/Watt	59.9+103%	29.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Graphics 6100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R5 430 launched at $59 and now averages $50. The Iris Graphics 6100 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 17.7 (Radeon R5 430) — the Iris Graphics 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon R5 430 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).