Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon HD 4770

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Iris Graphics 6100

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4770

2009Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon HD 4770 Performance Spectrum

Iris Graphics 6100
Shared System RAM 15
899
0.0%
brand logoArc Graphics 130T
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580
Radeon HD 4770
0.5 GB 80
909
+1.1%
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 5730
brand logoRadeon HD 7570
brand logoRadeon HD 6550A
brand logoRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700
brand logoRadeon R9 280
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon HD 4770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Graphics 6100

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 80W, a 65W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4770

2009

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Graphics 6100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 4770 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌433.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 4770 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (909 vs 899), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 4770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4770 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon HD 4770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Graphics 6100

The Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 899 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 4770

The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Graphics 6100 scores 899 and the Radeon HD 4770 reaches 909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 6100 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon HD 4770 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4770). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 0.96 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4770).

FeatureIris Graphics 6100Radeon HD 4770
G3D Mark Score
899
909+1%
Architecture
Generation 8.0
TeraScale
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS
0.96 TFLOPS+25%
ROPs
6
16+167%
TMUs
48+50%
32
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Graphics 6100Radeon HD 4770
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Graphics 6100 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4770 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 4770 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Graphics 6100 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4770.

FeatureIris Graphics 6100Radeon HD 4770
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4770). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureIris Graphics 6100Radeon HD 4770
DirectX
12 (11_1)+19%
10.1
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,VC-1 (Iris Graphics 6100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4770).

FeatureIris Graphics 6100Radeon HD 4770
Encoder
QuickSync
—
Decoder
QuickSync
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Graphics 6100 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 4770's 80W — a 136.8% difference. The Iris Graphics 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 400W (Radeon HD 4770). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 203mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 72°C.

FeatureIris Graphics 6100Radeon HD 4770
TDP
15W-81%
80W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
400W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
203mm
Height
0mm
—
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85
72°C-15%
Perf/Watt
59.9+425%
11.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Graphics 6100 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 4770 launched at $109. On MSRP, Iris Graphics 6100 was 100+% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) — the Iris Graphics 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Graphics 6100 (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureIris Graphics 6100Radeon HD 4770
MSRP
$0-100%
$109
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
8.3
Codename
Broadwell GT3
RV740
Release
January 5 2015
April 28 2009
Ranking
#913
#908
Search Iris Graphics 6100 on AmazonSearch Radeon HD 4770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.