Iris Graphics 6100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Graphics 6100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Graphics 6100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Graphics 6100

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌114.3% higher power demand at 15W vs 7W.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Iris Graphics 6100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 7W instead of 15W, a 8W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Iris Graphics 6100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (899 vs 889), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Graphics 6100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Graphics 6100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Graphics 6100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Graphics 6100

The Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 899 points.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 889 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Graphics 6100 scores 899 and the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU reaches 889 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
G3D Mark Score	899+1%	889
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Graphics 6100 and System on the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU.

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 12_0 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12_0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6+44%	3.2
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,VC-1 (Iris Graphics 6100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU).

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
Encoder	QuickSync	—
Decoder	QuickSync	—
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,VC-1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Graphics 6100 draws 15W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU's 7W — a 72.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
TDP	15W	7W-53%
Recommended PSU	1W	1W
Power Connector	Integrated	Integrated
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	59.9	127.0+112%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Graphics 6100 came in at $0, while the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Graphics 6100) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
MSRP	$0	$0
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	Infinity
Codename	Broadwell GT3	—
Release	January 5 2015	December 6 2018
Ranking	#913	#916

Search Iris Graphics 6100 on Amazon

Search Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.