Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon R7 240
Iris Graphics 6100
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 240
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Graphics 6100.
| Insight | Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 240 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon R7 240
Iris Graphics 6100
The Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 899 points.
Radeon R7 240
The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Graphics 6100 scores 899 and the Radeon R7 240 reaches 902 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 6100 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon R7 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 320 (Radeon R7 240). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 899 | 902 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+20% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+71% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+28% | 780 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 8+33% |
| TMUs | 48+140% | 20 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Graphics 6100 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 240 has 2 GB. The Radeon R7 240 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Graphics 6100 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 240's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Graphics 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 300W (Radeon R7 240). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 59.9+99% | 30.1 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Graphics 6100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R7 240 launched at $69 and now averages $15. The Iris Graphics 6100 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 60.1 (Radeon R7 240) — the Iris Graphics 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Graphics 6100 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $69 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 60.1 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3 | Oland |
| Release | January 5 2015 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #913 | #911 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon R7 240
