GRID K220Q vs Iris Graphics 6100

GRID K220Q

2014Core: 745 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Graphics 6100

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

GRID K220Q vs Iris Graphics 6100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K220Q vs Iris Graphics 6100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K220Q

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • βœ…Iris Graphics 6100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID K220Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.

Iris Graphics 6100

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
  • βœ…More future proof: Generation 8.0 (2014βˆ’2015) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $469 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID K220Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (912 vs 899), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID K220Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K220Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GRID K220Q vs Iris Graphics 6100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID K220Q

The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.

Intel

Iris Graphics 6100

The Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 899 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the Iris Graphics 6100 reaches 899 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K220Q is built on Kepler while the Iris Graphics 6100 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K220Q) vs 384 (Iris Graphics 6100). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 6100).

FeatureGRID K220QIris Graphics 6100
G3D Mark Score
912+1%
899
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 8.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536+300%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS+198%
0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+433%
6
TMUs
128+167%
48
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID K220QIris Graphics 6100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K220Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Graphics 6100 carries 0 MB. GRID K220Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K220Q and System on the Iris Graphics 6100.

FeatureGRID K220QIris Graphics 6100
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
πŸ–₯️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K220Q) vs 12 (11_1) (Iris Graphics 6100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGRID K220QIris Graphics 6100
DirectX
11_0
12 (11_1)+9%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the Iris Graphics 6100's 15W β€” a 175% difference. The Iris Graphics 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 6100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 265mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGRID K220QIris Graphics 6100
TDP
225W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
265mm
0mm
Height
β€”
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
β€”
85
Perf/Watt
4.1
59.9+1361%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K220Q came in at $469, while the Iris Graphics 6100 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Graphics 6100 was 100+% cheaper ($469 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID K220Q) vs Infinity (Iris Graphics 6100) β€” the Iris Graphics 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Graphics 6100 (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGRID K220QIris Graphics 6100
MSRP
$469
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1.9
Infinity
Codename
GK104
Broadwell GT3
Release
July 2 2014
January 5 2015
Ranking
#907
#913

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.