GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 6670/7670

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 6670/7670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K220Q

2014

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
373.7% HIGHER MSRP
$469 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 225W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 6670/7670

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
✅Delivers 391.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 225W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6670/7670 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (946 vs 912), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K220Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6670/7670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $370 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $469, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 391.4% (9.6 vs 1.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6670/7670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K220Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 6670/7670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K220Q

The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon HD 6670/7670

The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the Radeon HD 6670/7670 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K220Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K220Q) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670/7670).

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 6670/7670
G3D Mark Score	912	946+4%
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536+220%	480
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+297%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+167%	48 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 6670/7670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K220Q and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670/7670. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K220Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6670/7670) — the GRID K220Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 6670/7670
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6670/7670's 45W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6670/7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6670/7670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 6670/7670
TDP	225W	45W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	265mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	4.1	21.0+412%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K220Q came in at $469, while the Radeon HD 6670/7670 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6670/7670 was 78.9% cheaper ($370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID K220Q) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 6670/7670) — the Radeon HD 6670/7670 offers 405.3% better value. The newer card here is GRID K220Q (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP	$469	$99-79%
Performance per Dollar	1.9	9.6+405%
Codename	GK104	Turks
Release	July 2 2014	January 5 2012
Ranking	#907	#870

Search GRID K220Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6670/7670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.