GRID K220Q vs Quadro CX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K220Q vs Quadro CX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K220Q vs Quadro CX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K220Q

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,530 less on MSRP ($469 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 310.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
326.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$469 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro CX is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.8% in PassMark G3D (947 vs 912), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K220Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K220Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,530 cheaper on MSRP at $469 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 310.5% (1.9 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro CX still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID K220Q vs Quadro CX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K220Q

The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the Quadro CX reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K220Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K220Q) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).

Feature	GRID K220Q	Quadro CX
G3D Mark Score	912	947+4%
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1536+700%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+395%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+33%	24
TMUs	128+100%	64
L2 Cache	512 KB+167%	192 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K220Q	Quadro CX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K220Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX carries 4 GB. Quadro CX gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K220Q and 64-bit on the Quadro CX. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K220Q) vs 192 KB (Quadro CX) — the GRID K220Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K220Q	Quadro CX
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+167%	192 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K220Q) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GRID K220Q	Quadro CX
DirectX	11_0	11.1 (10_0)
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro CX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 265mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID K220Q	Quadro CX
TDP	225W	150W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	265mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	4.1	6.3+54%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K220Q came in at $469, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999. On MSRP, GRID K220Q was 76.5% cheaper ($1530 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID K220Q) vs 0.5 (Quadro CX) — the GRID K220Q offers 280% better value. The newer card here is GRID K220Q (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	GRID K220Q	Quadro CX
MSRP	$469-77%	$1999
Performance per Dollar	1.9+280%	0.5
Codename	GK104	GT200B
Release	July 2 2014	November 11 2008
Ranking	#907	#901

Search GRID K220Q on Amazon

Search Quadro CX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.