GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 6750M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 6750M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 6750M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K220Q

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.

Radeon HD 6750M

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $469 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6750M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (937 vs 912), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K220Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K220Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6750M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 6750M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K220Q

The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon HD 6750M

The Radeon HD 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 937 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the Radeon HD 6750M reaches 937 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K220Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6750M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K220Q) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6750M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750M).

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 6750M
G3D Mark Score	912	937+3%
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536+220%	480
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+297%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+167%	48 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 6750M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K220Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6750M carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 6750M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K220Q and System on the Radeon HD 6750M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K220Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6750M) — the GRID K220Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 6750M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 6750M's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon HD 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6750M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 6750M
TDP	225W	35W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	265mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	4.1	26.8+554%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID K220Q (2014 vs 2011).

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 6750M
MSRP	$469	—
Codename	GK104	Whistler
Release	July 2 2014	January 4 2011
Ranking	#907	#905

Search GRID K220Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6750M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.