GRID K220Q vs Radeon 6750M
GRID K220Q
Popular choices:
Radeon 6750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K220Q is positioned at rank 299 and the Radeon 6750M is on rank 182, so the Radeon 6750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K220Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K220Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 6750M.
| Insight | GRID K220Q | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (265mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 6750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon 6750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $40), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 59.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K220Q | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+59.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K220Q and Radeon 6750M
GRID K220Q
The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.
Radeon 6750M
The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the Radeon 6750M reaches 911 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K220Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon 6750M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K220Q) vs 480 (Radeon 6750M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M).
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 912 | 911 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+220% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+297% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+167% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K220Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon 6750M) — the GRID K220Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the Radeon 6750M's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 350W (Radeon 6750M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 35W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 265mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 26.0+534% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 6750M costs 37.5% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.8 (GRID K220Q) vs 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) — the Radeon 6750M offers 59.6% better value. The GRID K220Q is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $469 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $25-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.8 | 36.4+60% |
| Codename | GK104 | Whistler |
| Release | July 2 2014 | January 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #907 | #905 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K220Q and Radeon 6750M
