GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 4770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 4770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 4770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K220Q

2014

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
330.3% HIGHER MSRP
$469 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
❌181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.
❌30.5% longer card at 265mm vs 203mm.

Radeon HD 4770

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $360 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
✅Delivers 328.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.
✅Measures 203mm instead of 265mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K220Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (912 vs 909), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K220Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $360 cheaper on MSRP at $109 vs $469, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 328.9% (8.3 vs 1.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K220Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 4770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K220Q

The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon HD 4770

The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the Radeon HD 4770 reaches 909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K220Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 4770 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K220Q) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4770). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q) vs 0.96 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4770).

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 4770
G3D Mark Score	912	909
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536+140%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+138%	0.96 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+300%	32
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 4770
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K220Q and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4770. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K220Q) vs 128 KB (Radeon HD 4770) — the GRID K220Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 4770
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K220Q) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 4770
DirectX	11_0+9%	10.1
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 4770's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Radeon HD 4770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 400W (Radeon HD 4770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 265mm vs 203mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 4770
TDP	225W	80W-64%
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	265mm	203mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	72°C
Perf/Watt	4.1	11.4+178%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K220Q came in at $469, while the Radeon HD 4770 launched at $109. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4770 was 76.8% cheaper ($360 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID K220Q) vs 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) — the Radeon HD 4770 offers 336.8% better value. The newer card here is GRID K220Q (2014 vs 2009).

Feature	GRID K220Q	Radeon HD 4770
MSRP	$469	$109-77%
Performance per Dollar	1.9	8.3+337%
Codename	GK104	RV740
Release	July 2 2014	April 28 2009
Ranking	#907	#908

Search GRID K220Q on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.