GRID K220Q vs GRID P40-6Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K220Q vs GRID P40-6Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K220Q vs GRID P40-6Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K220Q

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,531 less on MSRP ($469 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 544.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌26400% longer card at 265mm vs 1mm.

GRID P40-6Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 265mm, a 264mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
539.7% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$469 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K220Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (912 vs 905), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K220Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K220Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,531 cheaper on MSRP at $469 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 544.6% (1.9 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID K220Q vs GRID P40-6Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K220Q

The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.

GRID P40-6Q

The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the GRID P40-6Q reaches 905 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K220Q is built on Kepler while the GRID P40-6Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K220Q) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-6Q).

Feature	GRID K220Q	GRID P40-6Q
G3D Mark Score	912	905
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128	128
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K220Q	GRID P40-6Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K220Q and 64-bit on the GRID P40-6Q.

Feature	GRID K220Q	GRID P40-6Q
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K220Q) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-6Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GRID K220Q	GRID P40-6Q
DirectX	11_0	12_1+9%
Max Displays	2	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the GRID P40-6Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID P40-6Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 350W (GRID P40-6Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 265mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GRID K220Q	GRID P40-6Q
TDP	225W	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	265mm	1mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Perf/Watt	4.1+2%	4.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K220Q came in at $469, while the GRID P40-6Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, GRID K220Q was 84.4% cheaper ($2531 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID K220Q) vs 0.3 (GRID P40-6Q) — the GRID K220Q offers 533.3% better value. The newer card here is GRID K220Q (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K220Q	GRID P40-6Q
MSRP	$469-84%	$3000
Performance per Dollar	1.9+533%	0.3
Codename	GK104	GK104
Release	July 2 2014	June 28 2013
Ranking	#907	#628

Search GRID K220Q on Amazon

Search GRID P40-6Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.