GRID K220Q vs GRID P40-6Q
GRID K220Q
Popular choices:
GRID P40-6Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K220Q is positioned at rank 299 and the GRID P40-6Q is on rank 396, so the GRID K220Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K220Q
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-6Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K220Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-6Q.
| Insight | GRID K220Q | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (265mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID K220Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID K220Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $150), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 277.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K220Q | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+277.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K220Q and GRID P40-6Q
GRID K220Q
The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.
GRID P40-6Q
The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the GRID P40-6Q reaches 905 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K220Q is built on Kepler while the GRID P40-6Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K220Q) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-6Q).
| Feature | GRID K220Q | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 912 | 905 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K220Q | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K220Q) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-6Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12_1+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the GRID P40-6Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID P40-6Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 350W (GRID P40-6Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 265mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 265mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1+2% | 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The GRID K220Q launched at $469 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GRID P40-6Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The GRID K220Q costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.8 (GRID K220Q) vs 6.0 (GRID P40-6Q) — the GRID K220Q offers 280% better value. The GRID K220Q is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K220Q | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $469-84% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-73% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.8+280% | 6.0 |
| Codename | GK104 | GK104 |
| Release | July 2 2014 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #907 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K220Q and GRID P40-6Q
