GRID K220Q
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
GRID K220Q vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K220Q vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID K220Q vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K220Q
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌237.4% HIGHER MSRP$469 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $330 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 240.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K220Q vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID K220Q
The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K220Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K220Q) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E).
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 912 | 921 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 4096+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+1990% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 128 | 256+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K220Q and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K220Q) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 28.6% difference. The GRID K220Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-25% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 265mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1+32% | 3.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K220Q came in at $469, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E was 70.4% cheaper ($330 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID K220Q) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E offers 247.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2014).
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $469 | $139-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 6.6+247% |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 48 |
| Release | July 2 2014 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #907 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K220Q and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
