
GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 8570

GRID K220Q
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K220Q is positioned at rank 299 and the Radeon HD 8570 is on rank 136, so the Radeon HD 8570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K220Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K220Q.
| Insight | GRID K220Q | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (265mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 107% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID K220Q | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+107%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K220Q and Radeon HD 8570

GRID K220Q
The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon HD 8570
The Radeon HD 8570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 944 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the Radeon HD 8570 reaches 944 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K220Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8570 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K220Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8570). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8570).
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 912 | 944+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 2.56 TFLOPS+12% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 320 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K220Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8570 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8570 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K220Q) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8570). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (11_1)+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 8570's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon HD 8570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 300W (Radeon HD 8570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 200W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 265mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 4.7+15% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K220Q launched at $469 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 8570 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The Radeon HD 8570 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.8 (GRID K220Q) vs 47.2 (Radeon HD 8570) — the Radeon HD 8570 offers 107% better value. The GRID K220Q is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $469 | $100-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $20-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.8 | 47.2+107% |
| Codename | GK104 | Pitcairn |
| Release | July 2 2014 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #907 | #460 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












