GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 4850

GRID K220Q

2014Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4850

2008Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 4850 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 4850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K220Q

2014

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 135.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $469 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 104.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 110W.

Radeon HD 4850

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $270 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
  • Delivers 144.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 110W instead of 225W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 4850 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (946 vs 912), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID K220Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4850 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $270 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $469, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 144.5% (4.8 vs 1.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4850 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID K220Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID K220Q vs Radeon HD 4850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID K220Q

The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.

AMD

Radeon HD 4850

The Radeon HD 4850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 946 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the Radeon HD 4850 reaches 946 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K220Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 4850 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K220Q) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K220Q) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4850).

FeatureGRID K220QRadeon HD 4850
G3D Mark Score
912
946+4%
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1536+92%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS+129%
1 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+220%
40
L1 Cache
128 KB
160 KB+25%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID K220QRadeon HD 4850
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K220Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 4850 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K220Q and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4850. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K220Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4850) — the GRID K220Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID K220QRadeon HD 4850
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K220Q) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4850). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGRID K220QRadeon HD 4850
DirectX
11_0+9%
10.1
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 4850's 110W — a 68.7% difference. The Radeon HD 4850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 450W (Radeon HD 4850). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 265mm vs 246mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGRID K220QRadeon HD 4850
TDP
225W
110W-51%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
265mm
246mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
4.1
8.6+110%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K220Q came in at $469, while the Radeon HD 4850 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4850 was 57.6% cheaper ($270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID K220Q) vs 4.8 (Radeon HD 4850) — the Radeon HD 4850 offers 152.6% better value. The newer card here is GRID K220Q (2014 vs 2008).

FeatureGRID K220QRadeon HD 4850
MSRP
$469
$199-58%
Performance per Dollar
1.9
4.8+153%
Codename
GK104
RV770
Release
July 2 2014
June 25 2008
Ranking
#907
#876

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.