Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon 6750M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M

#172

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

357%

#174

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

324%

#175

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

323%

#179

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

294%

#180

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

292%

#182

Radeon 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

100%

#183

GeForce GT 525M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#185

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

99%

#187

GeForce MX550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#195

GeForce GT625M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

93%

#197

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 6750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Graphics 6100.

Insight	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon 6750M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 6750M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Graphics 6100 Benchmark Check

Radeon 6750M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon 6750M

Iris Graphics 6100

The Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 899 points.

Radeon 6750M

The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Graphics 6100 scores 899 and the Radeon 6750M reaches 911 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 6100 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon 6750M uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 480 (Radeon 6750M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M).

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon 6750M
G3D Mark Score	899	911+1%
Architecture	Generation 8.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS+33%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	6	8+33%
TMUs	48+100%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon 6750M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Graphics 6100 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 6750M has 512 MB. The Radeon 6750M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon 6750M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Graphics 6100 draws 15W versus the Radeon 6750M's 35W — a 80% difference. The Iris Graphics 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 350W (Radeon 6750M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Iris Graphics 6100	Radeon 6750M
TDP	15W-57%	35W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	59.9+130%	26.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Graphics 6100 costs 100+% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) — the Iris Graphics 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Graphics 6100 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).