GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R5 430

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R5 430 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R5 430: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-6Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
4984.7% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌650% higher power demand at 225W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 430

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,941 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 4878% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 225W, a 195W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P40-6Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (905 vs 886), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P40-6Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 430 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,941 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4878% (15.0 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 430 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P40-6Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R5 430 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-6Q

The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon R5 430

The Radeon R5 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 886 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-6Q scores 905 and the Radeon R5 430 reaches 886 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-6Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 430 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 320 (Radeon R5 430). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-6Q) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430).

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Radeon R5 430
G3D Mark Score	905+2%	886
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+380%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+247%	0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	128+540%	20
L1 Cache	128 KB+60%	80 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Radeon R5 430
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P40-6Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 430. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID P40-6Q) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 430) — the GRID P40-6Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Radeon R5 430
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+300%	128 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R5 430). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Radeon R5 430
DirectX	12_1	12 (11_1)
Max Displays	0	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-6Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R5 430's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon R5 430 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-6Q) vs 350W (Radeon R5 430). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Radeon R5 430
TDP	225W	30W-87%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	4.0	29.5+638%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P40-6Q came in at $3000, while the Radeon R5 430 launched at $59. On MSRP, Radeon R5 430 was 98% cheaper ($2941 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 15.0 (Radeon R5 430) — the Radeon R5 430 offers 4900% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 430 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P40-6Q	Radeon R5 430
MSRP	$3000	$59-98%
Performance per Dollar	0.3	15.0+4900%
Codename	GK104	Jet
Release	June 28 2013	May 15 2016
Ranking	#628	#922

Search GRID P40-6Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 430 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.