GRID P40-6Q
VS
Radeon R7 240

GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R7 240

GRID P40-6Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 240

2013Boost: 780 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P40-6Q is positioned at rank 396 and the Radeon R7 240 is on rank 103, so the Radeon R7 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-6Q

#381
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
49243%
#396
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
100%
#397
Quadro FX 540
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
90%
#398
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
80%
#399
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
80%
#400
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
80%
#401
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
77%
#402
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
77%
#403
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
73%
#405
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
67%
#406
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
67%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
60%
#409
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
57%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
53%
#411
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
53%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 240

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
555%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
533%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
527%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
526%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
525%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
522%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
515%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
514%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
509%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
507%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
501%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
500%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
491%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
491%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
94%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
93%
#88
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
612%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
100%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
96%
#107
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
90%
#108
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
90%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
90%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
87%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
86%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
85%
#115
GeForce 605
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
84%
#116
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
83%
#117
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
81%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID P40-6Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 240 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 240
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $150), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 896.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 240
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+896.7%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-6Q and Radeon R7 240

NVIDIA

GRID P40-6Q

The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.

AMD

Radeon R7 240

The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-6Q scores 905 and the Radeon R7 240 reaches 902 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-6Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 320 (Radeon R7 240). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-6Q) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240).

FeatureGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 240
G3D Mark Score
905
902
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+380%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS+411%
0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
128+540%
20
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 240
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P40-6Q comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 240 has 2 GB. The Radeon R7 240 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID P40-6Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 240) — the GRID P40-6Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 240
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-6Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 240's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-6Q) vs 300W (Radeon R7 240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 240
TDP
225W
30W-87%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
4.0
30.1+653%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P40-6Q launched at $3000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R7 240 launched at $69 and now averages $15. The Radeon R7 240 costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 60.1 (Radeon R7 240) — the Radeon R7 240 offers 901.7% better value.

FeatureGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 240
MSRP
$3000
$69-98%
Avg Price (30d)
$150
$15-90%
Performance per Dollar
6.0
60.1+902%
Codename
GK104
Oland
Release
June 28 2013
October 8 2013
Ranking
#628
#911