GRID P40-6Q
Radeon R7 240
GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R7 240 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R7 240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R7 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P40-6Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌4247.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$69 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 13.1 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 225W vs 30W.
Radeon R7 240
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,931 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4233.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 225W, a 195W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R7 240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID P40-6Q
The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.
Radeon R7 240
The Radeon R7 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 902 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-6Q scores 905 and the Radeon R7 240 reaches 902 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-6Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 240 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 320 (Radeon R7 240). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-6Q) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 240).
| Feature | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 905 | 902 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+380% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+411% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+540% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-6Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 240 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 240 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P40-6Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 240. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID P40-6Q) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 240) — the GRID P40-6Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-6Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 240's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon R7 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-6Q) vs 300W (Radeon R7 240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.0 | 30.1+653% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P40-6Q came in at $3000, while the Radeon R7 240 launched at $69. On MSRP, Radeon R7 240 was 97.7% cheaper ($2931 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 13.1 (Radeon R7 240) — the Radeon R7 240 offers 4266.7% better value.
| Feature | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $69-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 13.1+4267% |
| Codename | GK104 | Oland |
| Release | June 28 2013 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #628 | #911 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P40-6Q and Radeon R7 240
