GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R7 M440

GRID P40-6Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M440

2016Core: 891 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R7 M440 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R7 M440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-6Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 900% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon R7 M440

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 895.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P40-6Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (905 vs 901), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P40-6Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M440 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,700 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 895.6% (3.0 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M440 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P40-6Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon R7 M440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-6Q

The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.

AMD

Radeon R7 M440

The Radeon R7 M440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 891 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 901 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-6Q scores 905 and the Radeon R7 M440 reaches 901 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-6Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M440 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 320 (Radeon R7 M440). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-6Q) vs 0.5702 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M440).

FeatureGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 M440
G3D Mark Score
905
901
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+380%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS+301%
0.5702 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
128+540%
20
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 M440
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P40-6Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M440. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID P40-6Q) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M440) — the GRID P40-6Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 M440
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 12 (Radeon R7 M440). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 M440
DirectX
12_1
12
Max Displays
0
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-6Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 M440's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R7 M440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-6Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M440). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 M440
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
1mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
4.0
12.0+200%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P40-6Q came in at $3000, while the Radeon R7 M440 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M440 was 90% cheaper ($2700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 3.0 (Radeon R7 M440) — the Radeon R7 M440 offers 900% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M440 (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID P40-6QRadeon R7 M440
MSRP
$3000
$300-90%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
3.0+900%
Codename
GK104
Meso
Release
June 28 2013
May 15 2016
Ranking
#628
#912

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.